Alternative correct answers on separate lines.
Correct answers in black. Incorrect answers in red.
| |
Time Taken |
|
| No. |
Name |
Class |
Score |
Days |
Hours |
Mins |
Secs |
Ans 1 |
Ans 2 |
Ans 3 |
Ans 4 |
Ans 5 |
Ans 6 |
Ans 7 |
Ans 8 |
Ans 9 |
Ans 10 |
Comment |
| | Correct Answer | | | | | | | 1275
| 1679
| 1
2
| 4
5
| 2275
| 3
| 3
| 1970
| 4
5
| 4
| | | 104 | Peter Booth | E | 3 | 0 | 0 | 30 | 57 | 1278 | 1679 | 2 | 7 | 2275 | | | | | | | | 106 | Peter Harbord | E | 5 | 0 | 0 | 30 | 35 | 1275 | 1679 | 1 | 4 | 2275 | | | | | | | | 108 | Philip Robbins | M | 10 | 0 | 1 | 31 | 17 | 1275 | 1679 | 1 | 5 | 2275 | 3 | 3 | 1970 | 4 | 4 | | | 111 | Clive Hodgson | E | 4 | 0 | 0 | 26 | 35 | 1275 | 1678 | 1 | 4 | 2275 | | | | | | RC2. Not much between 1678 and 1778 | | 115 | Geoff Masterman | E | 5 | 0 | 0 | 21 | 51 | 1275 | 1679 | 1 | 5 | 2275 | | | | | | | | 119 | Martin Moore | E | 5 | 0 | 0 | 19 | 3 | 1275 | 1679 | 1 | 4 | 2275 | | | | | | | | 121 | Arwel Jones | N | 5 | 0 | 0 | 28 | 14 | 1275 | 1679 | 1 | 5 | 2275 | | | | | | | | 122 | Steve Turnbull | E | 5 | 0 | 0 | 29 | 50 | 1275 | 1679 | 1 | 5 | 2275 | | | | | | | | 124 | Martin Dewey | N | 5 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 49 | 1275 | 1679 | 1 | 5 | 2275 | | | | | | | | 126 | Steve Barber | M | 10 | 0 | 0 | 57 | 53 | 1275 | 1679 | 1 | 5 | 2275 | 3 | 3 | 1970 | 4 | 4 | | | 129 | Gill Sweetman | E | 4 | 0 | 0 | 27 | 23 | 1275 | 1679 | 1 | 3 | 2275 | | | | | | | | 148 | Gillian Goodlass | M | 10 | 0 | 1 | 51 | 9 | 1275 | 1679 | 1 | 4 | 2275 | 3 | 3 | 1970 | 4 | 4 | Q9 answer of 4 assumes that the WWWW junction in GS 2074 is not sufficiently offset to be used twice. If it is then this provides a shorter route and the answer is 5 | | 151 | Catherine Buck | E | 5 | 0 | 0 | 22 | 42 | 1275 | 1679 | 2 | 4 | 2275 | | | | | | | | 156 | Robert Owen | M | 10 | 0 | 12 | 44 | 58 | 1275 | 1679 | 1 | 5 | 2275 | 3 | 3 | 1970 | 5 | 4 | Q9: If the 4-way junction in GS2074 can only be used once (to get to Rough), then the route only has 4 Y>W's. This means, however, 'hitting' a third Rake is unavoidable (White, Watersaw and High). Does this violate Rule 12? | | 157 | Paul Hardy | N | 3 | 0 | 1 | 20 | 54 | 1275 | 1679 | 0 | 6 | 2275 | | | | | | | | 165 | Mike Burrows | M | 8 | 0 | 1 | 14 | 11 | 1275 | 1679 | 2 | 4 | 2275 | 1 | 3 | 1970 | 3 | 4 | | | 166 | Peter Smith | M | 10 | 18 | 10 | 23 | 14 | 1275 | 1679 | 1 | 4 | 2275 | 3 | 3 | 1970 | 5 | 4 | | | 171 | Richard Lomax | N | 5 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 58 | 1275 | 1679 | 1 | 4 | 2275 | | | | | | | | 173 | Peter Robertson | M | 8 | 0 | 0 | 42 | 44 | 1275 | 1679 | 1 | 3 | 2275 | 2 | 3 | 1970 | 5 | 4 | | | 189 | Peter Davies | E | 5 | 3 | 2 | 48 | 3 | 1275 | 1679 | 1 | 5 | 2275 | | | | | | | | 190 | Glynn Hayward | M | 8 | 0 | 0 | 40 | 44 | 1275 | 1679 | 1 | 5 | 2275 | 2 | 3 | 1970 | 3 | 4 | | | 196 | Alan Large | E | 4 | 0 | 0 | 46 | 27 | 1275 | 1679 | 1 | 2 | 2275 | | | | | | | | 205 | Tim Hassall | E | 5 | 0 | 0 | 46 | 18 | 1275 | 1679 | 1 | 5 | 2275 | | | | | | | | 209 | Phillip King | E | 5 | 0 | 0 | 28 | 28 | 1275 | 1679 | 1 | 5 | 2275 | | | | | | | | 211 | Iain Tullie | M | 10 | 0 | 0 | 49 | 55 | 1275 | 1679 | 1 | 5 | 2275 | 3 | 3 | 1970 | 4 | 4 | Jn in GS 1473, from ChT, under T departing on Y to go through < counted as O>Y, rather than O>W>Y. RC's 3 & 4 increase to 2 and 6 respectively if this is considered to be O>W>Y. | | 218 | Sally Blake | N | 5 | 0 | 0 | 34 | 56 | 1275 | 1679 | 1 | 4 | 2275 | | | | | | | | 233 | Dee Rampling Lee | E | 5 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 52 | 1275 | 1679 | 1 | 4 | 2275 | | | | | | | | 234 | Richard Laking | N | 5 | 0 | 0 | 41 | 3 | 1275 | 1679 | 1 | 5 | 2275 | | | | | | | | 235 | Alan Crabtree | M | 9 | 0 | 2 | 52 | 22 | 1275 | 1679 | 0 | 4 | 2275 | 3 | 3 | 1970 | 5 | 4 | Gavin - can you add this to my comments for RouteCard 8, as I can't get back to it to add comments now:-
Oops! I've just seen where I dropped a point. In tidying up after sumitting everything for RC8 I now see the blue telephone in GS6604 - I had previously drawn a line over it, and didn't see it in my haste to get my answer in. It goes to show - More Haste, Less Points!! | | 236 | Kevin Nugent | N | 5 | 0 | 0 | 22 | 44 | 1275 | 1679 | 1 | 4 | 2275 | | | | | | | | 242 | David Killeen | M | 9 | 0 | 8 | 25 | 24 | 1275 | 1679 | 1 | 4 | 2275 | 3 | 3 | 1970 | 3 | 4 | | | 243 | Julian Challis | N | 4 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 31 | 1275 | 1679 | 2 | 2 | 2275 | | | | | | | | 247 | David Keetley | E | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 32 | 1275 | 1679 | 3 | 5 | 2275 | | | | | | | | 254 | Steve Bubb | E | 3 | 0 | 0 | 36 | 47 | 1278 | 1679 | 1 | 4 | 1376 | | | | | | | | 264 | Ian Canavan | M | 10 | 0 | 1 | 45 | 35 | 1275 | 1679 | 1 | 4 | 2275 | 3 | 3 | 1970 | 4 | 4 | | | 265 | Chris Bean | N | 5 | 0 | 0 | 28 | 11 | 1275 | 1679 | 1 | 5 | 2275 | | | | | | | | 268 | Jonathan Forrest | N | 3 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 3 | 1278 | 1779 | 2 | 5 | 2275 | | | | | | How did I only get one on this?? Easiest one to plot so far..... I have at least got the 1 & 2 & 5 right??? | | 269 | Chris Towers | M | 10 | 0 | 0 | 57 | 49 | 1275 | 1679 | 1 | 4 | 2275 | 3 | 3 | 1970 | 4 | 4 | | | 272 | Nigel Parish | E | 5 | 0 | 0 | 44 | 22 | 1275 | 1679 | 1 | 5 | 2275 | | | | | | | | 275 | Francis Tindall | M | 9 | 0 | 0 | 55 | 45 | 1275 | 1679 | 1 | 4 | 2275 | 3 | 3 | 1970 | 3 | 4 | | | 283 | David Smoley | E | 3 | 0 | 0 | 27 | 3 | 7 | 1679 | 2 | 6 | 2275 | | | | | | | | 284 | Jo White | N | 4 | 0 | 0 | 19 | 19 | 1275 | 1679 | 1 | 3 | 2275 | | | | | | | | 287 | Ron Bateman | N | 5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1275 | 1679 | 1 | 5 | 2275 | | | | | | |
|
